On occasion, we get a customer querying us who wishes to buy a SAS drive and wonder if they can install that drive into their personal PC.
We can understand where they are coming from: SAS drives are universally better than their SATA counterparts, both in terms of reliability and transfer speeds. So then, if SAS is better, and it comes in the same 2.5” or 3.5” form factor, why can’t I just install one in my desktop or even laptop?
Unfortunately, even with the use of readily available SAS-to-SATA adapters, in all likelihood, a SAS drive will not work in a desktop PC. (And even if you can get it functional, it won’t utilize the robust data transfer speeds of SAS).
We’ll deep-dive as to why it’s a no-go for a SAS drive in a PC desktop or laptop.
First: A Quick Primer (or Re-Primer) on SATA vs. SAS
SAS drives offer more reliability than SATA, a longer Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), and faster data transfer speeds. The higher rate is achieved through the “full-duplex” functionality of SAS – the ability to send and receive data at full speed concurrently (SATA drives can only send or receive data at one time). For these reasons, SAS is the drive format most often found in large-scale data centers where concurrent access to the data is a must.
Another key takeaway is SAS and SATA ports look very similar – the only cosmetic difference is the small bar on SAS drives which prevent it from being inserted into a SATA port.
While almost all Enterprise rack servers have backplanes that can run both SAS and SATA drives, this functionality is extremely rare in end-user desktops and virtually unheard of in laptops (the exception may be in some mobile workstations).
You can read more in our in-depth blogpost, SAS vs. SATA here.
What’s with the SATA-to-SAS Adapters Out There?
If SAS drives cannot work with an exclusively SATA controller device, why are there SAS-to-SATA adapters in the market? You may have come across these adapters advertised on Amazon, Newegg, or other tech sites.
If you look at the screenshots below, you can’t help but notice the extensive warnings on the descriptions for these adapters.
In other words, because the data transfer protocols of SAS and SATA drives are so different, simply using an adapter to get a SAS connector to fit a SATA port will not work. Your motherboard must have a SAS chip or controller to be able to utilize a SAS drive.
What Are My Options?
If you committed to using a SAS drive in your system, here are two possible solutions:
- Determine if your existing motherboard has a SAS chip. If it is a conventional PC designed for basic day-to-day tasks, it is doubtful. However, some high-end gaming towers do have SAS controllers.
- You can add a SAS controller to your system. There are PCIe SAS controllers available. Note that you would likely need to procure the appropriate SAS cable to connect the controller to the SAS drive. Some examples of a possibly compatible SAS controller for a desktop PC would be the Adaptec ASR-5805.
| FIND YOUR MOBO: You can determine your motherboard make & model several ways – the easiest is usually looking up “System Information” through Windows’ search bar and scrolling down to “Motherboard.” From there, you can look up the specs on the manufacturer’s site, and it will state whether or not it supports SAS drives. (You can also do it the old-fashioned way: open up your machine and read the part number off of the motherboard). |
Lastly, while SAS is unquestionably a more reliable and robust storage technology, these advantages don’t necessarily translate to the functions of conventional desktop PCs. You’re likely much better off investing your storage dollars in SSDs.
Have more questions? That’s what we’re here for! Email us at info@techmikeny.com, and one of our Techs will be happy to assist you!
10 comments
to mike who wrote “Don’t Try This at Home! Why Installing a SAS Drive in a Desktop or Laptop is a Bad Idea”.
I been thinking how to hook up SAS to PC for quit some time until recently I saw a new product “SAS HD docking station” which run under special USB 3 socket on docking station side, and common USB 3 socket on the other end (connection to PC side). Lot of review claim it work like fry. I believe it should work because new technology and demanding. It cost $200 +-
Thanks for the comment below, Dwain. You are correct that SAS drives are faster and more reliable than their SATA counterparts (and they can be cheaper than SATA drives — especially in the refurbished market. So you’ve come to the right place!) As for using an expansion card to use SAS drives in your system — yes, it could work. Under the “What Are My Options” section of the article, adding a SAS controller via PCIe card is listed as a possible option. The caveats are if that card is compatible with your system. Hope that helps and thanks again for the comment!
I have built several computers over the years and I am a computer enthusiast that tries to dive deep into model numbers and specs rather than just looking at the packaging. I have several computers in my house and want to convert one to a NAS/Plex server. It is about 8 years old and has a x170 motherboard with an i5 4 core processor and 12 GB of ram. I have burned the midnight oil on many nights searching NewEgg, Amazon, YouTube, and Google trying to wrap my head around this technology and decide the size and architecture of the drives.
The one thing I came away with was the SAS drives have a much better spec ( double speed and much better reliability) and are competitively prices compared to SATA drives (sometimes even cheaper) . I am not sure why I cannot buy an SAS 2 port card (8 drives max) and match it up with SAS cables for an SAS drive. I have seen where there are cables that go from on SAS port on the card to 4 drives. This sounds perfect. Why not?? You say that you have to find a motherboard with an SAS chip. Will the expansion card not do the same thing?
Skippy, thanks for the comment below. You are right. We were trying to say that the failure rate for SAS drives is lower – but then technically, as you say, MTBF would HIGHER since that is a more extended period until a failure. We have rephrased this sentence to read “a longer Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), and faster data transfer speeds.” Thanks again for the catch and for letting us know!
“a lower Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)” – don’t you want a HIGHER mean time between failure to indicate a device that lasts longer?